<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>You Can't Suck Enough &#187; Slate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.youcantsuckenough.com/blog/index.php/tag/slate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.youcantsuckenough.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:46:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s Secret Crush on Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.youcantsuckenough.com/blog/2010/01/microsofts-secret-crush-on-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.youcantsuckenough.com/blog/2010/01/microsofts-secret-crush-on-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yousuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youcantsuckenough.com/blog/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, the NY Times is saying Ballmer is going to announce Microsoft&#8217;s own slate tablet that it brewed up with HP at CES. Gizmodo&#8217;s got a demo of a prototype (which looks like it&#8217;s virtual until you see the photos further down&#8230;okay, it still looks virtual). Let&#8217;s start with the device first. I&#8217;m torn here. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-260" title="MicrosoftWuvsApple" src="http://www.youcantsuckenough.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/MicrosoftWuvsApple1.jpg" alt="" width="350" height="180" /></p>
<p>So, the NY Times is saying <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/05/ahead-of-apple-microsoft-and-hp-to-reveal-slate-pc/" target="_blank">Ballmer is going to announce Microsoft&#8217;s own slate tablet </a>that it brewed up with HP at CES. Gizmodo&#8217;s got a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5365299/courier-first-details-of-microsofts-secret-tablet" target="_blank">demo of a prototype</a> (which looks like it&#8217;s virtual until you see the photos further down&#8230;okay, it still looks virtual).</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start with the device first. I&#8217;m torn here. On the one hand it looks like what you&#8217;d expect a business-centric slate device should look like: an organizer. The ability to mix handwritten notes with photos and the like are a given (I mean, otherwise, you&#8217;d have an early 2000s slate PC which didn&#8217;t take off for a reason&#8230;who wants a boring barely functional PC?). The multi-touch support is also a given now that the iPhone is so ingrained into society as a whole now.</p>
<p>But on the other hand, just like my Palm which is sitting in some box somewhere with CAT3 cables and some dohickey for some device I no longer have, if all it does is act as a glorified personal organizer, why in the hell would I pay $1000 for that? Why not just pay $50 and get a paper organizer and be done with it?</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the extent of what the tablet&#8217;s going to be able to do (I&#8217;m assuming Microsoft&#8217;s hoping there&#8217;ll be more apps but I&#8217;m also assuming they&#8217;re going to make sure Word, Excel, and Powerpoint all work on it&#8230;right? Hello?), it&#8217;s useless beyond being something to show off in a few years as a &#8220;this is what it used to look like before they made it better&#8221;&#8230;kinda like those brick cell phones from the 80&#8242;s.</p>
<p>Granted, I have no idea if Apple&#8217;s going to be smart enough not to make their tablet a larger version of an iPhone (iPhone 3GSH&#8230;the H is for HUGE). But, they&#8217;ve also got to be thinking the device HAS to to somehow leverage their App Store. I mean, you&#8217;ve got to be stupid (or Apple) to scrap a huge industry you created yourself just so you can shine a spotlight on some new creation from the darkest regions of your R&amp;D labs.</p>
<p>Now back to our show. Or rather, Microsoft&#8217;s. Pretty funny that we only just got wind of the tablet announcement the day of Ballmer&#8217;s keynote. I mean, after all, doesn&#8217;t someone who&#8217;s keynoting one of the biggest (if not THE biggest) electronics conventions in the world plan their speach ahead of time. It couldn&#8217;t be because Jobs blew a sweet kiss of rumor talk into the ear of the WSJ just a couple days ago and because Macworld Expo is around the corner, could it? Couldn&#8217;t Microsoft just announced it at Macworld&#8211;oh, yeah, they only sorta like the Mac.</p>
<p>Maybe Microsoft should stop playing the frenemy card and just ask Apple out. Tell Apple how beautiful their designs are&#8230;for people who like designs. And show off your every-day-practical design and engineering&#8230;you know, the same <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">design</span> engineering that made Vista such a success.</p>
<p>Or maybe, you could talk about how great it would be, now that Macs run on the same hardware as PCs, if you could just figure out a better way to let Macheads and Windozers just-just get along.</p>
<p>On the plus side (for me; Microsoft, we&#8217;re done here, move along), at least this means Apple will have some potential competition (in some demographics). But, Apple&#8217;s track record means, all that will happen is Apple will keep it&#8217;s price at $1000 and Microsoft/HP will down it to $750 somehow ($850 with Microsoft Office bundled with it! A savings of over $199!!!!).</p>
<p>Stay tuned&#8230;</p>
<p>out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.youcantsuckenough.com/blog/2010/01/microsofts-secret-crush-on-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
