Archive for the ‘Microsoft’ Category

Visual Studio 2005 Slowness

Saturday, February 6th, 2010

Wow…despite the fact that I know there’s something else going on with my computer that’s slowing everything down when there’s a lot of disk access (e.g. AV scans, large copies, backups), Visual Studio’s been having it’s own fun running slow, especially during initial loads of files and projects.

At first I figured it was just VS being…well…a Microsoft product, combined with the HD issue. Then I decided to see if anyone else had issues and found this. Awesome. I can’t say I had the problem they had (definitely not 15 minutes) but (so far) it seems like it works.

In case the link goes dead, all they did was go to Tools > Import and Export Settings and select the Reset option. It won’t affect add-ons, just the core MS stuff. You will have to go in and change some of your settings back but definitely do NOT try to re-import your saved settings.

I guess the settings get bogged down or some setting gets set without your permission? I’m guessing here…after all, Microsoft products will let software installs to update your registry and other settings on your machine but if you try to do something, it’s all User Account Control, bitch!!

Whatever…suffice it to say, software and OSes developers need a swift kick once in a while to wake them up to their laziness and fragmentation (of teams). Or maybe I need to upgrade to VS 2008 before 2010 comes out…I can’t help it that Microsoft has trained me to stick with what works rather than upgrade to the latest and greatest. Every buggy, overpriced, and fundamentally different (in a bad way) new piece of software just turns me off the “arms race” of keeping up with the latest software.

I get that they need to make money and update the technology but really? I was just thinking about how much I hate the fact that we have to still support IE 7 (and are only just kicking IE6 out like a 20-something kid that needs to get a job). If it wasn’t for the whole software lifecycle process that Microsoft has (anyone notice how FireFox 2 just got it’s ass kicked and that was it?!?), we could be just worrying about IE8 which actually works almost like FF so there’s less of this BS I need to do to support both of them. One stylesheet for both browsers!

Anyhow, enjoy the tip above if it helps you…unless of course you’ve upgraded already and are enjoying the benefits (or trials?) of using VS 2008 or the 2010 rc.

out

Microsoft’s Secret Crush on Apple

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

So, the NY Times is saying Ballmer is going to announce Microsoft’s own slate tablet that it brewed up with HP at CES. Gizmodo’s got a demo of a prototype (which looks like it’s virtual until you see the photos further down…okay, it still looks virtual).

Let’s start with the device first. I’m torn here. On the one hand it looks like what you’d expect a business-centric slate device should look like: an organizer. The ability to mix handwritten notes with photos and the like are a given (I mean, otherwise, you’d have an early 2000s slate PC which didn’t take off for a reason…who wants a boring barely functional PC?). The multi-touch support is also a given now that the iPhone is so ingrained into society as a whole now.

But on the other hand, just like my Palm which is sitting in some box somewhere with CAT3 cables and some dohickey for some device I no longer have, if all it does is act as a glorified personal organizer, why in the hell would I pay $1000 for that? Why not just pay $50 and get a paper organizer and be done with it?

If that’s the extent of what the tablet’s going to be able to do (I’m assuming Microsoft’s hoping there’ll be more apps but I’m also assuming they’re going to make sure Word, Excel, and Powerpoint all work on it…right? Hello?), it’s useless beyond being something to show off in a few years as a “this is what it used to look like before they made it better”…kinda like those brick cell phones from the 80′s.

Granted, I have no idea if Apple’s going to be smart enough not to make their tablet a larger version of an iPhone (iPhone 3GSH…the H is for HUGE). But, they’ve also got to be thinking the device HAS to to somehow leverage their App Store. I mean, you’ve got to be stupid (or Apple) to scrap a huge industry you created yourself just so you can shine a spotlight on some new creation from the darkest regions of your R&D labs.

Now back to our show. Or rather, Microsoft’s. Pretty funny that we only just got wind of the tablet announcement the day of Ballmer’s keynote. I mean, after all, doesn’t someone who’s keynoting one of the biggest (if not THE biggest) electronics conventions in the world plan their speach ahead of time. It couldn’t be because Jobs blew a sweet kiss of rumor talk into the ear of the WSJ just a couple days ago and because Macworld Expo is around the corner, could it? Couldn’t Microsoft just announced it at Macworld–oh, yeah, they only sorta like the Mac.

Maybe Microsoft should stop playing the frenemy card and just ask Apple out. Tell Apple how beautiful their designs are…for people who like designs. And show off your every-day-practical design and engineering…you know, the same design engineering that made Vista such a success.

Or maybe, you could talk about how great it would be, now that Macs run on the same hardware as PCs, if you could just figure out a better way to let Macheads and Windozers just-just get along.

On the plus side (for me; Microsoft, we’re done here, move along), at least this means Apple will have some potential competition (in some demographics). But, Apple’s track record means, all that will happen is Apple will keep it’s price at $1000 and Microsoft/HP will down it to $750 somehow ($850 with Microsoft Office bundled with it! A savings of over $199!!!!).

Stay tuned…

out

Close your browser…you’re violating a patent…

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

I’ve had a hate-hate relationship with our patent system for quite some time now. An understaffed department of the US government is doling out patents for things that are more common sense than innovations. They’ve been doing it for years and it’s gotten worse as the rate of technological innovation and advancement grows exponentially.

TechCrunch had a quick blurb about Microsoft getting sued by a company called i4i which holds this patent: 5,787,449. It seems a judge ordered Microsoft to stop selling Word (pretty standard). I’m sure Microsoft will get the injunction delayed or something until the case is finally heard. Leave it to a blogger (wait…) to overhype a bit of news (yeah, I did the same thing, too bad).

Seriously, I think it’s time to toss some of that bailout money into the Patent office to hire more people who actually UNDERSTAND technology. In addition, it’s time to cap patent infringement penalties and set the default judgment for an infringement case to be a license/royalty of 1% of net revenue from the product’s sale. And that’s ONLY if you have a product on the market. If you don’t, then you need to PROVE you were working on a product (i.e. show that you weren’t sitting on the patent for longer than a year) to get the previously mentioned judgment and penalties.

C’mon, the main point behind the fucking patent system was to get ideas out there so innovation can roll forward. You have an idea for a round object that can be used to make carts move without being carried by slaves? Awesome, I’ve got a cart that needs slaves to go forward but jeez, your “wheel” as you call it means I can just put a horse in front of it and BAM, we’re rolling. Oh yeah, and someone said I can’t use slaves any more so it’s win-win.

Instead, it’s a system to a) prevent the world from innovating because you’re too greedy to fairly license your invention, and b) a method for a couple of guys who have no idea how to run a successful, global business to finally fund their company so they can sit on their asses and watch Bachelor reruns during work hours. And check their site…has anyone heard of them before today? Aren’t we the little company that found a way to read our patent that makes it sound like we own the world.

Check out the patent. It’s as obscure as you can get but they’re basically talking about ANY XML-based system…which you could argue means any SGML-based system which includes HTML. So, the browser you’re using is a potential violator of the patent along with the developer’s tools used to build the site you’re looking at right now. Oh, and if you’re a content management system vendor and decided to use some sort of markup-based method to make content storage vendor-agnostic, watch out.

I’m telling you. This system is stiffling innovation in this country…the same innovation that put us at the top of the world in innovation…the same innovation that drove many foreigners (yes, I’m talking to you Chinese and Indian visa holders) to come through and learn everything they can so they can benefit their countries (not ours)…the same innovation that makes money out of thin air (I’m talking to you Google)!

And before you start up on my being racist or anything, get the fuck out. I’m not even white.  I’m not saying ALL of them are here to steal everything and I don’t hate any of them. But consider this, there’s a reason two countries that had little modern technological innovation and even industries until the last decade or so are suddenly in the mix. India has a middle-class now because of this country…both because of the knowledge they’ve gained but also the opportunities they’ve taken advantage of. You think Shanghai would be where it is now if it wasn’t for all those Japanese, European and American factories that were built and then claimed by the Chinese for one reason or another? The key here is that there’s a global economy out there and we’re a big part of it.

I give us 50 years before we’re a vassal of China. We’re already in debt to them (thank BUSH for that, not OBAMA, you fucking townhall ragers). They steal everything they can from us (though it’s our fault…whose epicfail idea was it to launch a US military TOP SECRET satellite on CHINESE soil? What did you think was going to happen?). And everyone out there (yes you) would rather ensure they get their gas guzzling fucking cars than spend a dime on education. Did you know the California penal system’s budget is TWICE as a large (100% more than) the state’s education system? You know the California lottery? About how it was supposed to funnel billions into education? Well, someone forgot to mention the billions they took out.

I almost think going the trade-secret-only route is the best solution here. Then again, I’m a fan of competition as long as it’s not just simple knock-off bullshit. Competition helps drive innovation and lights a fire under your ass to do better. Look at every case where monopolies raged (rail, steel, whatever)…notice how the leaders of those industries just milked their customers rather than continue to innovate (we might be driving flying cars right now if it wasn’t for Big Oil spooning with the automakers)?

Back to the main story…I got one word for i4i: SCO. Their stock is trading at a whopping $0.09/share. Good luck. Enjoy the ride you ambulance chasing trolls…hope your new Gulfstreams don’t slam into a mountain by mistake–that’d be a waste of a good plane.

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=12&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=5,787,449&OS=5,787,449&RS=5,787,449

Google Pwns Microsoft?

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

No way it looks that good!
In not unexpected news, Google’s decided to bring bland, boring UI and perpetual beta software to your PC! Here’s the actual announcement link.

C’mon guys. I mean, okay, Chrome is super fast and great for people who want a fast clean browser to hit up your usual pron sites. But, as the basis for an operating system? Web apps are advanced but not that advanced. And, don’t give me this bullshit about iGoogle being a great UI. Google’s UIs have generally sucked more than anyone cares to admit since they’re free.

Google’s UIs have largely been uninspired, drab, and utilitarian. Do you really want that for the OS that you’re going to stare at (ideally) at work and at home? Sure you’ll run other apps so some of it will go away but you’ll still see it. And don’t tell me to wait for a third-party to fix it…that shouldn’t be a requirement.

Tell you what, if you’re still running XP, go change the look and feel from the Windows XP Style to the Windows Classic Style. I’ll wait a sec…wait for it…waiting…cue screams of terror. Simplistic overly utilitarian designs are crap. No one buys Apple computers, phones or iPods because they’re drab and designed for utility over looks.

And, OS reliability and performance? You understand why your Google Searches are fast…there IS no OS. They use a bare-bones stripped down Linux OS that likely has NO UI…they probably terminal into it. Besides, half their products are still in beta and unless you’re paying a premium good luck when they go down. Redundancy isn’t going to help you at home with a single computer. They’ve got thousands. It’s like the difference between losing a neuron or your entire brain…guess which one is more noticeable.

Then there’s compatibility. What browser are you using? What word processor, spreadsheet and presentation software are you using? Any of them say Google on them (no not the friggin search field)? Of course not. Sure you use Google all the time…it’s called a search engine. You know why you use it (outside of the fact that it worked better than all the others that are long gone or trying to re-launch themselves as something better years too late)? Because you can use it in ANY browser. FireFox is not Google. Put that hand down.

Apple-Steve-JobsSo, why rant about this? Actually, it’s not what you think. Sure I think they’re going to make a shitty OS that will be like, I dunno, every Linux GUI created or the BeOS or something, where it’s cool and interesting but ultimately not what you use everywhere else in life. Naw, that’s not the problem. It’s not that it’s adding competition to the OS market. That’s actually GOOD. It’s about time someone who actually has a chance (i.e. has money and is a household name) gave Microsoft a run for their money. What about Apple you ask? What about them? All this time…especially the last few years with the iPod and iPhone. What’s their marketshare? 10% for the OS? 8% for the Macs themselves. And, their PCs are still too expensive compared to everyone else (okay, maybe not TOO expensive but still on the high side of comparables).

No, my problem is that Google’s OS stands to lower the bar on OS prices. Good you say? Good for you the consumer, sure. You pay less. But, you know you get what you pay for right? Think about it from another perspective. You know how you’ve got that fancy graphics card in your machine? How you like to play Halo, Crysis or something more fun like COD? If it weren’t for the fact that game devs weren’t trying to achieve crazy like making reflective water or realiwindows_7_9stic blood or something, you’d still be using a 64kB chip sitting on the motherboard…staring at spinach green or amber text while you tap out a document or read some mail. Then you’d fire up Pong or something stupid because no one wanted to bring out the best of the machine in front of you…they just wanted to make money off a cheap OS.

Is it the end of the world? Naw. It changes the playing field and like I said, it’ll light a fire under Microsoft’s ass so they might actually try to innovate finally instead of creating bloated malware. We’ll have to see but I’m warning you: keep an eye on Google’s OS…it might turn your screen into a blob of pastel boxes with lots of Google Ads all around the edges. You heard it here first.

out

Tired of that iPhone dialog in Windows?

Sunday, May 10th, 2009

You got your iPhone running on Windows! Congrats! Not too hard but always a balancing act with Windows. Now, you started noticing something…this stupid dialog keeps coming up…and there’s no way to stop it from happening:

Please go away!

Please go away!

Well, we felt your pain and wandered the wastelands of Windows help to find you the solution. You can thank us later…

out

IE 8: Why bother?

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

First, sorry for the hiatus…life called. Enough said.

Alright, full disclosure here on two fronts: first, I have NOT used IE 8 yet. I’ve got Virtual PC and a virtual waiting for me to try that nutter out. Second, I’m a Web developer by trade and have had to deal with the craptastic support for Web standards in IE6 and IE7.

I’ve been a loyal IE user for years (up until I discovered FireBug on FF2, at least) largely because it was (and still is, I might add) the predominant browser out there. If you’re going to develop a site for anyone but your local Linux or Mac group, you’re going to be developing for some version of IE.

Now, IE 8′s supposed to be this great new release of IE that brings it up to par with Web standards while improving speed, security, and your waist size or whatever the PR department decides to churn out. For me, the Web developer, I’m looking forward to better Web standards support so I don’t have to tie my code into knots trying to make it work with IE6 (good luck with CSS selectors) and IE7 (JS processing speed is only marginally faster than IE6) while still being compatible with FF (2 had its issues too, you know).

But, here’s the thing…the majority of people USING current IE versions could care less about Web standards. All they care about is that they got this new computer and lookie here! It comes with a Web browser. Internet Explorer? Whatever, just show me the way to my porn sites! I’m ready! And what do they care about? Simple: does the site I want to get to display properly and otherwise work?

Here’s the catch though…since the majority of the herd people out there are already using IE and Web developers like myself have to support them, those sites ARE going to work with IE. Meanwhile, I’ve got my twenty different search toolbars, I’ve got tabbed browsing, I’ve got great phishing support so people can steal my information, I’m set!

What’s IE8 got? Outside of better Web standards support? Check out the feature list…it’s frigging boring! Web slices sounds interesting…except it’s just a glorified RSS feed. Accelerators? Yeah, accelerators to Windows sites we don’t want to use. I love it…I can almost see a Microsoft representative standing on a stage in front of the press positively glowing about all these great places you can go with a single right-click. It’s like shopping at Whole Foods. It seems like every day you see another “store brand” taking over shelf space.

To invoke the spirit of Henry Ford with a smidge of paraphrase: You can view maps, email, search and shop for anything you want, as long as you do it on a Windows Live site. It’s hilarious. Where are the anti-trust lawyers when you need them?

Better still, it seems IE8′s not doing a whole lot to set itself apart from Microsoft’s wonderful reputation for crapware. I mean, c’mon…add something cool…give us a reason to switch. Or do the FireFox thing and give your users no friggin choice. Oh wait, I think they heard me.

Welcome to Microsoft’s version of choice. Your choice? Cut yourself off from security updates and the like if you prefer to stick with what you’ve got. It doesn’t matter if your toolbars might not be compatible. It doesn’t matter if you just happen to like using a dated and broken browser…you’ve got to upgrade from useable to shit.

Congratulations, Microsoft. You’re maintaining your suckage levels at their highest levels. You still can’t stuck enough!

Suck me.

Windows Mojave, fittingly named after a desert…

Monday, December 15th, 2008

So, Microsoft’s been carpet bombing your favorite channels with the Mojave Experiment commercials purporting to show how the general populace has been duped by a handful of cranky geeks (and, uh, the general media but they don’t know what they’re talking about either).

I find it funny that the fake Windows was named after an arid desert with hostile climates…and they’re using a Polynesian theme song. I guess Microsoft is consistent with their confusion and lack of insight into just about anything they create nowadays.

Back to our news. I’d been curious (Microsoft generally pisses me off…love/hate relationship…but I have to know) as to what they were showing in Vista. I know people who upgraded for one reason or another (64-bit OS, just wanted something modern, etc.). Were they happy with it? Yes and no. I know a gamer who did and instead of getting some sort of super OS with DirectX 10 (which is the other reason outside of the 64-bit OS/increased RAM support that he upgraded). He had a joy of a time trying to deal with the driver incompatibilities and hoping the games he was trying to play would work (forget about backward compatibility as it’s hit or miss).

My experience? I had even more fun…I got to play with Vista’s big brother, Windows Server 2008. What a sack of shit. Of course, the UAC had to go because whoever invented that load of crap should’ve been locked in a house running Server 2k8. Go to open the bathroom door, “You are about to open the bathroom door, are you sure you are trying to do this?” What the fuck? Are you telling me it’s THAT hard to determine if I clicked with my mouse or if a malicious program sent a click command at position 10, 20? Fuck sake, then, you’re building a new fucking OS, make the API calls made directly (rather than from drivers) fucking go through the UAC check…not ME, the human clicking the hardware device passing the signal through the USB cable to your sorry bus.

I gotta say, I think the QA department that had to deal with this fubar feature deserver medals of honor.

On a whim, I visited the Mojave experience site. I love it…they give you a small/short video on the demo they presented to these focus group people…god I hope they presented more than that because if that’s all they presented you’ve got to wonder if Microsoft even realize how stupid they look? The demo talked about the backup and shadow copy functions of the OS….Oooo…so impressive. The fuck? Is it me or is no one noticing that you had to SEARCH for the fucking backup tool. And, for the average joe…they could give a shit. Oh, and I noticed the demos were done on laptops. Uh, just how “quick and easy” would the backup be for people who, in day of pennies per GB HDs (I just bought a 1TB drive for $120, jeez), have a 250GB hard disk be that simple?

Anyhoo, I think Microsoft was going down the right path when they did their little mock commercials in the “I’m a PC” series. It was down their alley (straight-laced, not funny) but it worked and didn’t make them look stupid…it made them look like they are…the market leader (not that people have that much of a choice). Maybe instead of fighting Apple, they should just learn a little bit. After all, Apple’s software isn’t that much better than Microsoft’s in terms of stability and functionality (they just design it better but good luck when things don’t go according to plan…unless you’re a UNIX-head).

With that, I leave Microsoft to CONTINUE to suck. They already can’t suck enough…just had to add to the pile.

Suckers…