Archive for the ‘Bad Business Model’ Category

Late Seating Policies in Theaters = Bad Customer Service

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Alright, I’m back to gripe once again. Sorry for the hiatus.

I don’t know if you have one of these sorts of movie theaters in your area but here in Los Angeles, there are a handful of theaters and theater chains (if you can call them that) which are trying to differentiate themselves with a few nice features:

1) Assigned seating (no more struggling to find a place for you and yours)

2) Stadium seating (no more fuzzy borders for your movie)

3) Bars and 21+ screenings (so you can enjoy that crappy movie your girlfriend wants to see because you’ll be drunk)

4) No late seating (so that jack-off who weighs 400lbs doesn’t drop popcorn all over you while smashing your feet as he tries to get to his seat).

That last one is the the reason we’re here today, class.  Is it a good policy? Damned right it is. I’ve been in enough theaters where you’ve got to watch silhouettes of morons trying to find their seats 15 minutes into the movie.

Here’s the thing though: late seating isn’t a crime. It’s not nice and it can be annoying but it doesn’t always have to be. Here was my situation today:

1) Delayed by a last minute work thing.

2) Traffic for no apparent reason at 10:40 am. It’s usually find by now, especially on a Friday.

3) Finding a parking space.

4) Dealing with a disorganized and slow concessions stand–you’ve got to love it when they have 3-4 people behind the stand and just two customers, one of which is me, and it still take 5-10 minutes to get to me and get my order filled.

All told, I was 30 minutes late. Sure that sucked and was well beyond any time I’ve been late to a movie. But check it out:

1) It was a 10:45am showing on a weekday.

2) I’ve been to plenty of screenings on weekdays, though at more reasonable times (like 12 or 1pm). Even popular movies have no more than 20-30 people).

3) The theater seats upwards of 400 people and has stadium seating.

4) I was in an aisle seat…I’m ALWAYS in an aisle seat.

5) The theater has a back door.

6) I’m a paying customer at 10-fucking-45 AM. I’m like solid gold. You’re showing the movie whether the theater’s full or not.

This is the point where you as a supervising member of staff at the theater have to decide something. Is it better to have an irate/pissed off/disappointed customer under these circumstances or do you make an exception, collect your $34 dollars (with concessions after all), and find some way to accommodate a regular customer?

The Letter of the Law

Let’s put it another way. When it comes to laws (as in those that say you can’t kill someone or something like that), there’s this idea of the “spirit of the law“. It basically means adhering or enforcing a law based on what it was intended to do, rather than just following it to the letter. Hell, California’s even got one of these “fuzzy” laws to govern driving rules.

For instance, if you have a law that says something like “You can’t kill someone.” You look at that and understand what it means…you aren’t allowed to just kill someone. Nice, great law. Wait, what happens when that someone is a murderer who’s trying to kill you? The letter of the law says you can’t kill someone so guess what happens when you snuff out that murdered in self-defense? You’re getting a priest and a needle.

But, the spirit of the law would interpret it more like, “You can’t kill someone, unless they’re trying to kill you.” And, I think most people would agree, that is what you’d want to enforce.

I know, I know, extreme example. But it’s a simple one too. Just like customer service. I’m sure you’ve been the victim of some stupid (or maybe even good…most of the time) customer service policy at some company. Why? Because not every customer service department head or policy maker is a genius at customer service…and not all of them are guided by ensuring the customer’s well-being is top priority–they’ve got to make money too.

Customer Service

Still, you’ve seen both sides of the story I’m sure. For instance, if you’ve ever made a purchase from Zappos you’ve probably experienced some great customer service. Whether it’s them randomly upgrading a shipment to overnight free of charge or just dealing with their hassle-free (and, well, free) returns policy, they do a great job of customer service because they think about the customer first. They aren’t giving away the farm but their policies are designed to keep the customer happy since happy customers mean return customers and more revenue.

Meanwhile, you’ve got other companies that will charge you restocking fees, return shipment costs, and make life as hard as possible for you to return items and otherwise deal with the “abnormal” aspects of commerce.  In fact, a lot of companies seem to hide behind their policies, whether it’s a returns policy or some other policy that is meant to protect the company in some way.

What’s the point?

Which brings us back to this issue. The theater in question? Arclight Theaters. Will I go back? Probably but they’ve definitely lost points here. I mean c’mon. It’s like some fucking idiot standing in front of a stand of chairs surrounded by rope with a sign saying, “No late seating.”

You walk up, there’s not one seat with anyone in it. You ask the idiot: “Can I get a seat?”

Idiot: “Sorry, sir, the event started 30 minutes ago.”

You: “But, no one’s sitting in there.”

Idiot: “Sure, but you’re 30 minutes late. We don’t seat anyone after the event starts.”

You: “But, it’s not like I’m disturbing anyone…no one’s sitting there!”

Idiot: “Our policy states we don’t seat anyone after the event starts.”

You: “WTF?”

Idiot: “Sorry, sir, those are the rules.”

You: “How about if I give you some money…after all, who’s going to pay for the event?”

Idiot: “No thanks, if you’d like us to give you some money, please step over to the customer service booth.”

You: “Wait, you want to give me money that I’m happy to give you?”

Idiot: “Yes, we don’t need it. Our first priority is customer service.”

You: “I’m a customer.”

Idiot: “And we’d be happy to provide you with service at the booth.”

You: “You love your job, don’t you.”

Idiot: “Sorry, sir, I don’t have a stored response for that statement. Please go to the customer service booth.”

You could almost make a movie out of that…but then, who’d want to be on time for that piece of crap?

Moral of the story: Figure out what you’re here to do. If you really want to take care of your customers, stop gripping your policies like a security blanket and start paying attention to what you’re saying to your customers when they’re most unhappy…you might actually learn something.

out

Another Patent Troll Surfaces…

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

paltalk-logoSeems there’s another company (they breed like cockroaches) with patents on an idea that’s as basic to today’s world as breathing.

PalTalk Holdings (note: holdings…which means, we can’t make money doing anything so we have to buy some patents and sue people) managed to convince Microsoft it wasn’t worth pursuing a $90 million lawsuit. They settled in a way that sounds like Microsoft either agreed to pay a couple million a year in licenses or a nice lump sum of a few million more for a lifetime license (something these trolls love to do).

Now, CocksuckTalk Holdings is pointing its grubby little paws at MMO makers, SOE, Activision Blizzard, NCSoft, and Jagex (the makers of Runescape). With Blizzard pulling in over $1 billion a year with WoW, you can imagine what these cocksuckers are seeing. I’m sure they’re hoping they can get a solid settlement that adds up to tens of millions of dollars a year or a lump sum closer to $100 million so they don’t have to worry about their in ability to produce something worth selling.

This sort of trolling sickness has got to be stopped. It’s 100% counter to the point behind a patent system. I’m telling you right now, the more this sort of bullshit is allowed to continue the less innovation as a method of advancement and commerce will be seen as worthwhile.

If you’re going to patent something, patent it to protect what you’re producing. And, the USPTO needs to learn to stop allowing generic patents through.

And, assuming the patent isn’t that generic (this article hints that it was more specific and thus wasn’t even applicable), Microsoft handed PalTalk what it needed to make life hard for a lot of people. Mind you, most aggressive trolls suffer the consequences of their greed but time will tell if we’ll be able to see PalTalk’s bankruptcy filing in the near future.

Hey, PalTalk, you’re ranking high on the list of those who just can’t suck enough. Go fuck  yourselves and find something better to do…

Boy, I hope they piss off someone at Blizzard enough for them to invest a few million in ripping you to shreds. And, as you shiver and moan in the aftermath, all you see is all that money you were hoping to make off this go towards buying back all your credibility you left behind in a pool of your own blood.

Close your browser…you’re violating a patent…

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

I’ve had a hate-hate relationship with our patent system for quite some time now. An understaffed department of the US government is doling out patents for things that are more common sense than innovations. They’ve been doing it for years and it’s gotten worse as the rate of technological innovation and advancement grows exponentially.

TechCrunch had a quick blurb about Microsoft getting sued by a company called i4i which holds this patent: 5,787,449. It seems a judge ordered Microsoft to stop selling Word (pretty standard). I’m sure Microsoft will get the injunction delayed or something until the case is finally heard. Leave it to a blogger (wait…) to overhype a bit of news (yeah, I did the same thing, too bad).

Seriously, I think it’s time to toss some of that bailout money into the Patent office to hire more people who actually UNDERSTAND technology. In addition, it’s time to cap patent infringement penalties and set the default judgment for an infringement case to be a license/royalty of 1% of net revenue from the product’s sale. And that’s ONLY if you have a product on the market. If you don’t, then you need to PROVE you were working on a product (i.e. show that you weren’t sitting on the patent for longer than a year) to get the previously mentioned judgment and penalties.

C’mon, the main point behind the fucking patent system was to get ideas out there so innovation can roll forward. You have an idea for a round object that can be used to make carts move without being carried by slaves? Awesome, I’ve got a cart that needs slaves to go forward but jeez, your “wheel” as you call it means I can just put a horse in front of it and BAM, we’re rolling. Oh yeah, and someone said I can’t use slaves any more so it’s win-win.

Instead, it’s a system to a) prevent the world from innovating because you’re too greedy to fairly license your invention, and b) a method for a couple of guys who have no idea how to run a successful, global business to finally fund their company so they can sit on their asses and watch Bachelor reruns during work hours. And check their site…has anyone heard of them before today? Aren’t we the little company that found a way to read our patent that makes it sound like we own the world.

Check out the patent. It’s as obscure as you can get but they’re basically talking about ANY XML-based system…which you could argue means any SGML-based system which includes HTML. So, the browser you’re using is a potential violator of the patent along with the developer’s tools used to build the site you’re looking at right now. Oh, and if you’re a content management system vendor and decided to use some sort of markup-based method to make content storage vendor-agnostic, watch out.

I’m telling you. This system is stiffling innovation in this country…the same innovation that put us at the top of the world in innovation…the same innovation that drove many foreigners (yes, I’m talking to you Chinese and Indian visa holders) to come through and learn everything they can so they can benefit their countries (not ours)…the same innovation that makes money out of thin air (I’m talking to you Google)!

And before you start up on my being racist or anything, get the fuck out. I’m not even white.  I’m not saying ALL of them are here to steal everything and I don’t hate any of them. But consider this, there’s a reason two countries that had little modern technological innovation and even industries until the last decade or so are suddenly in the mix. India has a middle-class now because of this country…both because of the knowledge they’ve gained but also the opportunities they’ve taken advantage of. You think Shanghai would be where it is now if it wasn’t for all those Japanese, European and American factories that were built and then claimed by the Chinese for one reason or another? The key here is that there’s a global economy out there and we’re a big part of it.

I give us 50 years before we’re a vassal of China. We’re already in debt to them (thank BUSH for that, not OBAMA, you fucking townhall ragers). They steal everything they can from us (though it’s our fault…whose epicfail idea was it to launch a US military TOP SECRET satellite on CHINESE soil? What did you think was going to happen?). And everyone out there (yes you) would rather ensure they get their gas guzzling fucking cars than spend a dime on education. Did you know the California penal system’s budget is TWICE as a large (100% more than) the state’s education system? You know the California lottery? About how it was supposed to funnel billions into education? Well, someone forgot to mention the billions they took out.

I almost think going the trade-secret-only route is the best solution here. Then again, I’m a fan of competition as long as it’s not just simple knock-off bullshit. Competition helps drive innovation and lights a fire under your ass to do better. Look at every case where monopolies raged (rail, steel, whatever)…notice how the leaders of those industries just milked their customers rather than continue to innovate (we might be driving flying cars right now if it wasn’t for Big Oil spooning with the automakers)?

Back to the main story…I got one word for i4i: SCO. Their stock is trading at a whopping $0.09/share. Good luck. Enjoy the ride you ambulance chasing trolls…hope your new Gulfstreams don’t slam into a mountain by mistake–that’d be a waste of a good plane.

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=12&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=5,787,449&OS=5,787,449&RS=5,787,449

Experts Exchange Missing Expertise?

Friday, March 13th, 2009

If you’ve had some sort of tech issue, I’m sure you’ve happened upon experts-exchange.com hits in Google which (I’ll be optimistic here) more often than not had some modicum of a solution for you to said tech issue.

It’s always been a bit dicey (people asking for homework solutions, assholes as experts, etc.) but it’s held up for a while. Hell, it started this whole Answers industry that Amazon and Yahoo have sunk their own teeth into. And, clusterfuck answering of questions theoretically can net you a true and realistic answer (just like all those monkeys writing Shakespeare). But, here’s the clincher…that was true as long as it was free.

Now, from what I’ve read, the company behind the sexpert’s exchange (expert sex change.com) went belly up and sold out to another company that sees walls plastered with c-notes in their future.  The funny thing is, I was logged in and able to see solutions through until just a few weeks ago.

I “rebuilt” my machine (spankin new HD) recently and went through that wonderful ritual of trying to figure out what I forgot to back-up/copy before I had to start over (fuck you Microsoft and the registry your OS rode in on).

So, I did a search for something stupid I needed an answer for and landed on an experts-exchange.com page. Beauty…seems someone else had the same problem and–what’s this? I can’t see the solution? Oh, right, need to login. Okay, let’s try the usual culprits…no dice. Forgot password. None of the possible e-mail addresses I could’ve given over to these idiots work. Hmm.  Well, what the hell…my handful of expert points probably didn’t amount to more than a potato chip of value so I thought I’d just sign up again.

BAM. Seven day free trial. Sorry? Seven days? You mean Seven Days A Week Free Trial, right? Nope. Seems I either had been slipping through their impenetrable wall of greed for months (I guess people’ve have been dealing with trial issues for a year now…wow) or they decided to pick this week to finally turn off the spigot completely to tech yokels like me.

Thing is…with the search that got me to their site, I got another 98,200 results from Google. Let’s see…pay money for a site with “experts” that are more like the average joe than real experts or just search for other sites with the same solution via Google. Difficult choice.

Experts Exchange…you really can’t suck enough.