<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Close your browser&#8230;you&#8217;re violating a patent&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.youcantsuckenough.com/blog/index.php/2009/08/close-your-browser-youre-violating-a-patent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.youcantsuckenough.com/blog/2009/08/close-your-browser-youre-violating-a-patent/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:54:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Office Win</title>
		<link>http://www.youcantsuckenough.com/blog/2009/08/close-your-browser-youre-violating-a-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Office Win</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youcantsuckenough.com/blog/?p=189#comment-50</guid>
		<description>If this fiasco takes MS down a notch, score a win for Open Office.

Also, the only reason they call it &quot;Microsoft Office Open XML&quot; is to confuse people &quot;What? Microsoft Office is Open Source with XML?&quot;...Microsoft should be barred from using the word &quot;Open&quot; in any form...that is the most Closed company ever...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this fiasco takes MS down a notch, score a win for Open Office.</p>
<p>Also, the only reason they call it &#8220;Microsoft Office Open XML&#8221; is to confuse people &#8220;What? Microsoft Office is Open Source with XML?&#8221;&#8230;Microsoft should be barred from using the word &#8220;Open&#8221; in any form&#8230;that is the most Closed company ever&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yousuck</title>
		<link>http://www.youcantsuckenough.com/blog/2009/08/close-your-browser-youre-violating-a-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>yousuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 00:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youcantsuckenough.com/blog/?p=189#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Even so, like you said, they probably should&#039;ve have gotten the patent. Now because of that, some lawyers are getting a lot of money and the court system is spending our taxpayer dollars to settle it. And, depending on the process you&#039;re talking about, who knows where else they might take their patent case if they set a precedent in court...or at the very least by settling (which can imply either side of the argument was correct but which side do you think i4i is going to push??).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even so, like you said, they probably should&#8217;ve have gotten the patent. Now because of that, some lawyers are getting a lot of money and the court system is spending our taxpayer dollars to settle it. And, depending on the process you&#8217;re talking about, who knows where else they might take their patent case if they set a precedent in court&#8230;or at the very least by settling (which can imply either side of the argument was correct but which side do you think i4i is going to push??).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.youcantsuckenough.com/blog/2009/08/close-your-browser-youre-violating-a-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youcantsuckenough.com/blog/?p=189#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Actually, they are talking not about XML markup in general, but a way of having markup information separate from the text.  It&#039;s an old idea and it&#039;s a bad idea and they shouldn&#039;t have gotten a patent, but most XML doesn&#039;t infringe.  Microsoft&#039;s Office Open XML infringes, ODF doesn&#039;t. Maybe some good will come from this bad patent after all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, they are talking not about XML markup in general, but a way of having markup information separate from the text.  It&#8217;s an old idea and it&#8217;s a bad idea and they shouldn&#8217;t have gotten a patent, but most XML doesn&#8217;t infringe.  Microsoft&#8217;s Office Open XML infringes, ODF doesn&#8217;t. Maybe some good will come from this bad patent after all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
